I got mine pierced when I was 7-years-old, so what's the difference?

As far as parenting goes, we're big fans of incentives. If you want to call it "bribing," that's fine. Because let's be honest - life is about incentive. We go to work to get a paycheck. We work harder to get bigger paychecks. We don't see anything wrong with starting the incentive system with our preteen son. That's what an allowance, no? An incentive to do chores? ;)

He's been Irish dancing for almost three years now and in an attempt to get him to practice more and work towards a goal, we told him that if he competes in a feis (pronounced 'fesh' - means Irish dance competition), he could get his ears pierced. He's been asking us to do this for about a year now, so we decided to use it as a carrot-on-a-stick.

Image result for carrot on a stick gif

Well, just like everything else in life, the time has come. The competition is tomorrow, and he's been practicing for three months. So now, we're planning for the payoff - getting his ears pierced. Straight studs, nothing fancy. He wants both ears. He's aware that it's a commitment, possibly lifelong. He's aware that he has to clean them and take care of them, and he's not allowed to gauge them until he's 18.

Of course, as a mom, I was hesitant. But wouldn't it be sexist to say that he can't do it? Why the heck not? I had mine pierced when I was SEVEN. Hell, by the time I was his age, I had TWO piercings in BOTH ears.

It was an interesting conclusion to come to, that it's sexist to say that a preteen boy can't get his ears pierced but that it's fine for girls, as young as babies, to have theirs pierced.

Image result for dont be a menace message gif